Please check out our to request being added to our calendar. To search AMAs by category!
- Air Traffic Controller 3 Game
- Air Traffic Controller 3 English
- I Am An Air Traffic Controller 3 Pc Download
Consider supporting our AMAs are scheduled in Eastern Time (GMT-4:00). Date Time Person Description 20 Aug 11am Reporter for PennLive 21 Aug 12pm Noted author, inveterate blogger and prolific activist 21 Aug 1pm Author and Expert on Chinese Tech Policy 21 Aug 1pm Creative Director of Zachtronics 21 Aug 2pm Anaite Alvarado Surviving a Guatemalan Prison 22 Aug 12pm Rebecca Newkirk Perfectionism Specialist 22 Aug 2pm Sheldon Xia Founder and CEO of BitMart Exchange 23 Aug 12pm Patrick Weekes, Charlie Barangan, Kendrick Tu Game Design Team of Uncaged: World Fighters Card Game 23 Aug 12:30pm Former U.S. Jim Gerlach (R-PA) and Martin Frost (D-TX) Former Members of U.S. Congress 27 Aug 5pm Filmmaker, author, TV, YT (Living Waters) 28 Aug 7pm Representative of Georgia State House District 101 29 Aug 11am Executive Director for lowernine.org 29 Aug 2pm Nacho on Better Call Saul 31 Aug 1pm Mayor: South Bend, IN 4 Sep 10am Civilian and Military Submariners 4 Sep 12:30pm Rachel Houtz, Sam Witte, Josu H.
G., Julia Gherlein, Andrea Caputo, Chloe Ramson Young physicists studying neutrinos and dark matter 4 Sep 1:30pm Researcher: YouTube Host: Content Creator: Office Oddity Submitting: AMAs should be about:. Something uncommon that plays a central role in your life, or. A truly interesting and unique event. All AMAs require proof. Proof should be included in the text of the post when you start your AMA. If it must remain confidential, you can and we can verify you. Request threads.
Requests should be posted in Commenting: Please note:. All initial responses to posters must contain a properly punctuated question. Attempting to bypass this rule by adding a? To a non question will result in a permanent ban. Other: Useful Links!.
or. 6 Jun. Specialized Profession. 27 Jul. Specialized Profession. 8 Jun. Medical.
5 Jul. Science. 9 Apr.
Military Please check out our. I am an Air Traffic Controller working at one of the top 8 busiest UK airports by runway movements per year. I've found that not many people really understand what we do or how we do it, and infact a good portion of people dont even know we exist. If there's anything you ever wanted to know or ask, AMA! For obvious reasons as I'm still in the job, I wont be risking my career by revealing sensitive company information, but otherwise feel free. My Proof: For obvious reasons I've removed my photo, signature, name, company I work for and the pass serial number.
EDIT: I didnt realise this would be so popular. Please be patient everyone, Im trying to get through your posts. If I dont reply, please check other replies as I have probably already answered somewhere. 2nd EDIT: A few FAQ's:.
No its not like Breaking Bad - we couldnt do that. Salary starts at £12k a year to train, top of pay scale of experienced controllers is like £110k+. I dont really have any tips for how to succeed and I couldnt tell you anyway I'm afraid. All publically available knowledge is available on wikipedia and forums though. No, I do not know where MH370 is. Please feel free to check the responses. I had no idea how many replies I would get, thanks for your time in reading.
Most questions have been answered in there somewhere. Any further questions feel free to inbox me. Happy flying! EDIT 3: I have been made aware that some information I provided regarding a video of the A-SMGCS and voice overlay was not in fact an official release. I'm told it was infact supplied to the crew who made their own decision to upload it.
The video is not owned by me nor am I responsible for it. The video is still available to view on YouTube if you search for it, and my sincerest apologies for any offence caused. My view that the controller that day was and is a credit to the profession remains. Basically I know the same as the press releases. A problem came up in a line of code in one of the programs the en-route controllers use to help them manage more traffic than they could do manually. Controllers are always trying to give the airlines the most efficient routings, continuous climbs to cruising level etc.
From what I understand the program had an error and restarted. In order to keep things safe, flow management was implemented. Thats designed to reduce the load of a sector to prevent bunching of aircraft or there just being too many to handle.
Normally with all the management programs running, controllers are able to handle a huge amount of traffic based on predictions about its path, and identify conflictions. When those programs dont work, the controller has to make manual judgements and spend more time checking them for safety, hence the safest place for aircraft that havent yet departed is still on the ground. Granted it did cause a lot of delays, especially at airports like Heathrow.
Heathrow operates at like 99.5% capacity, so those delays have knock on effects meaning some flights had no option but to be cancelled. Believe it or not, working in a control tower is pretty mundane. Once you get over the excitement of planes being everywhere you look, its just like any other job:') You'd be surprised how many people that live near airports phone directly through to the controllers to complain about the noise that arriving and departing aircraft make. I didnt build the airport where it is, and in all likelyhood the airport has been there longer than they have! I find the most interesting times to be when we get cockpit crews come to visit us. Its really vital that we maintain a good understanding of each other's thought processes.
I dont want to be issuing instructions to a crew at a particularly intense phase of flight to prevent from distracting them, but equally they might want to know why we issue an instruction in a certain way, what the thought processes are behind it etc. Scariest is without a 'piggy-back go-around'. Thats where one aircraft is coming down final approach to land, but ahead of it an aircraft is lined up to depart. As long as we can see aircraft from the window we can separate them visually, as opposed to radar controllers who usually have to provide 3 or 5 miles or 1000ft between aircraft.
Sometimes we'll issue a take-off clearance with plenty of time to spare, but the air crew will get an indication in the cockpit and sit for a few moments to let it settle before rolling. Sometimes this can make it too tight to give a landing clearance to the aircraft behind (as you can only legally land something once the departing aircraft has lifted from the runway) and the landing aircraft carries out a missed approach. In this scenario you have one aircraft on climb out with another aircraft slightly above and behind it also climbing out. In that situation we'll often turn one by 90 degrees and let the other climb straight ahead so we get plenty of distance between them before sorting it out.
Believe it or not, working in a control tower is pretty mundane. Once you get over the excitement of planes being everywhere you look, its just like any other job:') Youre right! I work in Engineering, and my office is in the hangar. After a few months of being dumbstruck by walking past 2 380s and a 777 in one big room, or 320s that look like ants compared to the 380s, it gets kinda meh believe it or not. But from time to time, I just grab a chair and sit in the far corner of the hangar bay and drink tea and just stare at these ginormous machines while they're being worked on. It's pretty nice:p.
I am an air traffic controller AIRPORT HERO OSAKA-KIX Free eShop Download Code Get your free copy of I am an air traffic controller AIRPORT HERO OSAKA-KIX using our free download codes that you can redeem on the Nintendo eShop. Limited copies left. You can redeem I am an air traffic controller AIRPORT HERO OSAKA-KIX for any 3DS or 2DS and eShop region as long as there are still free copies left from our download codes vault.
Game Overview The story takes place at Kansai International Airport(“KIX”) KIX is one of the world’s very few airports on the ocean, built on an artificial island! KIX, with two runways, is a busy airport that operates 24 hours a day, full of international airplanes in the day, and as an airline hub for international cargo flights at night. Your skills are challenged to operate smooth air traffic control at KIX packed with many airplanes!
Challenge air traffic control with 2 game modes! Challenge air traffic control while enjoying dramatic story in “Story Mode” or score the target point to clear the stage in simple “Operation Mode”! Story Mode. “Story mode” is best for your first try!. You can learn how to play while enjoying the dramatic storyline. You are responsible for air traffic control at KIX with your reliable boss: Tsukasa Kamijo, and new trainees Asuka Kominato and Mamoru Ozora. You must protect the safety of the sky while training the new boys, according to your boss’s advice.
Accurate decisions are needed under unexpected situations and special weather conditions, during air traffic control! In addition, you must follow up for the trainees’ inexperienced control!. With teamwork and flexible situation handling, succeed in difficult traffic control! Operation Mode.
“Operation Mode” is very simple!. Send specific orders to airplanes on the airport and in the air, support landing and takeoff for safe control!. If airplanes fall into danger of collision, the game is over.
Control real-time moving airplanes to aim the highest score!
Hello I have experience in five years in the game 'Air Traffic Controller 3' company 'Technobrain' from Japan. I have a lot scenarios for Air Trafic Controller 3. I have scenarios for RJBB,RJTTD,RJCC,RJTT,RJSS,RJAH,RJAA,RJAAN,VHHHX, RJGG airports.
All scenarios with required models. I have all set of models 100%. All scenarios a tested 100% and able to work. I accept for payment the webmoney, kiwi wallet,Yandex money, etc Skype neonelomax A waiting your reply soon. I hope for long-term cooperation. I have experience in five years in the game 'Air Traffic Controller 3' company 'Technobrain' from Japan.
I have a lot scenarios for Air Traffic Controller 3. I have scenarios for RJBB,RJTTD,RJCC,RJTT,RJSS,RJAH,RJAA,RJAAN,VHHHX, RJGG airports. All scenarios with required models. I have all set of models 100%. All scenarios a tested 100% and able to work. I accept for payment the webmoney, kiwi wallet,Yandex money, etc Skype neonelomax A waiting your reply soon. I hope for long-term cooperation.
On Friday, September 26, 2014, a telecommunications contractor named Brian Howard woke early and headed to Chicago Center, an air traffic control hub in Aurora, Illinois, where he had worked for eight years. He had decided to get stoned and kill himself, and as his final gesture he planned to take a chunk of the US air traffic control system with him. Court records say Howard entered Chicago Center at 5:06 am and went to the basement, where he set a fire in the electronics bay, sliced cables beneath the floor, and cut his own throat.
Paramedics saved Howard's life, but Chicago Center, which controls air traffic above 10,000 feet for 91,000 square miles of the Midwest, went dark. Airlines canceled 6,600 flights; air traffic was interrupted for 17 days. Howard had wanted to cause trouble, but he hadn't anticipated a disruption of this magnitude. He had posted a message to Facebook saying that the sabotage “should not take a large toll on the air space as all comms should be switched to the alt location.” It's not clear what alt location Howard was talking about, because there wasn't one. Howard had worked at the center for nearly a decade, and even he didn't know that. At any given time, around 7,000 aircraft are flying over the United States.
For the past 40 years, the same computer system has controlled all that high-altitude traffic—a relic of the 1970s known as Host. The core system predates the advent of the Global Positioning System, so Host uses point-to-point, ground-based radar. Every day, thousands of travelers switch their GPS-enabled smartphones to airplane mode while their flights are guided by technology that predates the Speak & Spell. If you're reading this at 30,000 feet, relax—Host is still safe, in terms of getting planes from point A to point B. But it's unbelievably inefficient. It can handle a limited amount of traffic, and controllers can't see anything outside of their own airspace—when they hand off a plane to a contiguous airspace, it vanishes from their radar. The FAA knows all that.
For 11 years the agency has been limping toward a collection of upgrades called NextGen. At its core is a new computer system that will replace Host and allow any controller, anywhere, to see any plane in US airspace. In theory, this would enable one air traffic control center to take over for another with the flip of a switch, as Howard seemed to believe was already possible. NextGen isn't vaporware; that core system was live in Chicago and the four adjacent centers when Howard attacked, and this spring it'll go online in all 20 US centers. But implementation has been a mess, with a cascade of delays, revisions, and unforeseen problems.
Air traffic control can't do anything as sophisticated as Howard thought, and unless something changes about the way the FAA is managing NextGen, it probably never will. This technology is complicated and novel, but that isn't the problem. The problem is that NextGen is a project of the FAA. The agency is primarily a regulatory body, responsible for keeping the national airspace safe, and yet it is also in charge of operating air traffic control, an inherent conflict that causes big issues when it comes to upgrades. Modernization, a struggle for any federal agency, is practically antithetical to the FAA's operational culture, which is risk-averse, methodical, and bureaucratic.
Paired with this is the lack of anything approximating market pressure. The FAA is the sole consumer of the product; it's a closed loop. The first phase of NextGen is to replace Host with the new computer system, the foundation for all future upgrades. The FAA will finish the job this spring, five years late and at least $500 million over budget. Lockheed Martin began developing the software for it in 2002, and the FAA projected that the transition from Host would be complete by late 2010. By 2007, the upgraded system was sailing through internal tests. But once installed, it was frighteningly buggy.
It would link planes to flight data for the wrong aircraft, and sometimes planes disappeared from controllers' screens altogether. As timelines slipped and the project budget ballooned, Lockheed churned out new software builds, but unanticipated issues continued to pop up.
As recently as April 2014, the system crashed at Los Angeles Center when a military U-2 jet entered its airspace—the spy plane cruises at 60,000 feet, twice the altitude of commercial airliners, and its flight plan caused a software glitch that overloaded the system. Even when the software works, air traffic control infrastructure is not prepared to use it. Chicago Center and its four adjacent centers all had NextGen upgrades at the time of the fire, so nearby controllers could reconfigure their workstations to see Chicago airspace. But since those controllers weren't FAA-certified to work that airspace, they couldn't do anything. Chicago Center employees had to drive over to direct the planes.
And when they arrived, there weren't enough workstations for them to use, so the Chicago controllers could pick up only a portion of the traffic. Meanwhile, the telecommunications systems were still a 1970s-era hardwired setup, so the FAA had to install new phone lines to transfer Chicago Center's workload.
The agency doesn't anticipate switching to a digital system (based on the same voice over IP that became mainstream more than a decade ago) until 2018. Even in the best possible scenario, air traffic control will not be able to track every airplane with GPS before 2020. For the foreseeable future, if you purchase Wi-Fi in coach, you're pretty much better off than the pilot. FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE, IF YOU PURCHASE WI-FI IN COACH, YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH BETTER OFF THAN THE PILOT. A big, high-risk infrastructure upgrade like NextGen will never move as fast as change associated with consumer technology, but the real hurdles are not technical, they're regulatory. In the private sector, new technologies can be developed freely regardless of whether the law is ready for them.
Think of Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb: Outdated regulations slowed them down, but consumer demand is forcing the law to evolve. This back-and-forth is what lets tech companies move fast and break things without risking our safety.
But when the government upgrades its technologies, regulations intercede before a single line of code is written. The government procurement process is knotted with rules and standards, and new technology has to conform to those rules whether or not they're efficient or even relevant. These issues screwed up HealthCare.gov and are screwing up the Department of Veterans Affairs and a dozen other agencies that need computers and software that work. The current process stifles innovation from the start and mires infrastructures like NextGen, which need to carry us far into the future, in the rules of today. The government needs to change its procurement process, and it's got to let go of its stranglehold on air traffic control. Privatization isn't necessarily the answer. Canada, the UK, Germany, Sweden, and Australia operate air traffic control through various separate entities, from semiprivate to nonprofit to government corporations, that help facilitate the necessary push and pull between technological risk-taking, regulatory caution, and pressure from end users.
The first real pressure on the FAA to show results came, ironically, from Howard. He forced what was essentially the first real-time operational test of the new system. When NextGen faltered, the program faced a level of widespread public scrutiny that it had previously evaded, and the FAA had to respond.
The agency published a review of its contingency processes, including new plans to enable control centers to assist each other in emergencies. Brian Howard, hell-bent on destruction, was the best thing to happen to our air traffic control system in years. SARA BRESELOR wrote about the in issue 23.01.
I Am An Air Traffic Controller 3 - Tokyo Big Wing By Chip Barber (7 January 2009) OK, show of hands. How many of you are familiar with the game 'Reversi'? It is also referred to as 'Othello', at least here in the States. Download pictures from sd card to computer. It is advertised in part, as are several others, as 'A minute to learn, a lifetime to master'. Well, here's another game to add to those of which this is descriptive.
Now, don't get all frazzled and unglued by the term 'game'. You see, this is not your usual piece of software. If you've ever used the wonderful simulation, you will understand my reluctance to refer to it as a game. It is not really a game at all, but a simulation of the stress-inducing world of the Approach Air Traffic Controller.
ATC3, the next in line in this series of software, picks up where ATCS2 left you: in the position of the Tower controller. But here's the rub. Where, at least for me anyway, it was difficult if not impossible to approach ATCS2 as a game, ATC3 is capable of doing just that.
Do you know the name, Brad Davis? He is the developer of ATCS1 and 2. Well, Brad and I have an ongoing discussion regarding the nature of ATC3. Game or simulation? My thought was it is more a game; he has managed to convince me it is also a simulation cut of the same cloth as his software. The point he made that finally got me to come around to his point of view is one may simply run the software exclusively from the view of the tower controller. Now, why didn't I think of that?
I'll tell you why. Because the nearly endless opportunities to watch the action in and around Tokyo Haneda airport (RJTT), to fail to take a look at all these 'magical' views would be a shame! What ATC3 offers to the tower controller is, I imagine, something you 'real world' controllers would give their left.
Shoe, to have. In a word, you are able to go anywhere, any time, to get an almost unlimited view of the activity not only in and around RJTT (and, ultimately, other airports as well), but miles away as your aircraft is happily flying its SID departure or STAR approach. From the tower, the controller's view is limited to line of sight (which isn't too shabby, by the way). But here, in the ATC3 world, a click or two will have you at, above, and all around any location in which you as the controller may have an interest. So, being as you're supposed to adopt the role of a tower controller, let's have a look at the tools of your trade.
First, a look at your new office. Here, the aircraft RED305 is ready for departure, and it is up to you to grant authorization for pushback, and assign a SID departure route.
The routes are described on the last page of the paper manual. Something to keep in mind: all the voice communication is in Japanese accented English, and at first takes some concentration to understand clearly. All com exchanges are also transcribed for you, but in short order, you will become accustomed to the accents and will have no difficulty understanding the pilots. Brad will be working on voice sets from 'locals', too.
Air Traffic Controller 3 Game
Here, BLU3751 is requesting a tug from maintenance to a gate. You are presented with a potential route, and may alter it by clicking on the blue spots, or even assign it a different gate with the green spots.
Your call, controller! Clicking on 'OK' causes a tug to appear, and it will tow BLU3751 to its new position. Of course, when it gets busy, you've got to keep in mind where other aircraft will be going, and assign them a hold command in order to avoid a situation in which a collision will occur. Unfortunately, the pilots in ATC3 move as assigned, and failing to issue a 'Hold' command results in instant failure of the scenario. As always, the route is easily modified as necessary. The aircraft may always be given a 'Hold' command. Once we clear '305, there are endless views by which to follow his/her progress.
Remember to keep an eye on their progress to ensure a safe trip. You must also remember the route you assigned, as there will be other aircraft wishing to depart, aircraft that are arriving wishing transit to a gate, and aircraft that are being moved from one place to another. Perhaps you are now beginning to understand why this game/simulation is not unlike Reversi. Manipulation of the aircraft is not difficult, accomplished by only a mouse click or two. But once things are rolling, your job of safe transit for all these aircraft becomes a little more tricky. And, you may ask, how does one 'win' this game/simulation?
Well, for one thing, and perhaps most important, maintain separation! Crunching noises coming from the tarmac always result in a failure of the scenario. Something else to avoid is stressing the pilots. This ingenious little function is always visible on the screen, and is quantified by causing delays or giving lousy directions to the pilot. Below, see the section that says 'Stress'? That reflects the cumulative stress levels of all your pilots, and the larger the percentage, the worse you are doing.
It is also a fairly accurate gauge of your own stress levels, too. This gives you an opportunity to change the heading of the arriving BLU52.
With the runway selected either manually or through the program, you then hand off the pilot to the tower controllers (also played by you. Isn't this fun?) for further guidance.
Air Traffic Controller 3 English
Now, with all this happening, you are being contacted by other arrivals, departures and requests for gate changes. Remember that stress level thingy? A word about technical stuff. Installation was a breeze, just a couple of mouse clicks. On my machine, it ran as smooth as glass with no stutters or freezes.
I Am An Air Traffic Controller 3 Pc Download
But, I ran ATC3 on a high end machine: 3.60 MHz Quad Core processor with 3G RAM, GeForce GTX 260 Graphics card. I do not know how well this software will run on your machine. Also, a word about Who Does What. TechnoBrain produced and developed this wonderful software, and while the official name is 'I am an Air Traffic Controller 3 - Tokyo Big Wing', it is commonly referred to as 'ATC3' (small wonder, right?). And my friend, Brad Davis' (developer of the also wonderful ATCS1 and 2) role was to assist in the English conversion of the program.
So, this is just a taste of ATC3. I think this is a more than worthy companion of ATCS 1 and 2. Is it a game, or a simulation? It will depend on your approach to the program. But regardless of what you choose to call it, it is a ton of fun to use, and in my humble opinion, is a 'must have' for anyone who enjoys the ATC side of flight simulation.